FHIRsmith: ValueSet/ValueSet-R5-v3-SecurityIntegrityObservationType-for-R4B.json

FHIR IG analytics

Package	hl7.fhir.uv.xver-r5.r4b
Resource Type	ValueSet
Id	ValueSet-R5-v3-SecurityIntegrityObservationType-for-R4B.json
FHIR Version	R4B
Source	http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/xver-r5.r4b/0.0.1-snapshot-2/ValueSet-R5-v3-SecurityIntegrityObservationType-for-R4B.html
URL	http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/ValueSet/R5-v3-SecurityIntegrityObservationType-for-R4B
Version	0.0.1-snapshot-2
Status	active
Date	2025-09-01T22:37:05.396272+10:00
Name	R5_v3_SecurityIntegrityObservationType_for_R4B
Title	Cross-version VS for R5.SecurityIntegrityObservationType for use in FHIR R4B
Realm	uv
Authority	hl7
Description	This cross-version ValueSet represents concepts from http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SecurityIntegrityObservationType\|2.0.0 for use in FHIR R4B. Concepts not present here have direct `equivalent` mappings crossing all versions from R5 to R4B.

Resources that use this resource

No resources found

Resources that this resource uses

CodeSystem
v3-ActCode	ActCode

Narrative

Note: links and images are rebased to the (stated) source

Generated Narrative: ValueSet R5-v3-SecurityIntegrityObservationType-for-R4B

This value set expansion contains 7 concepts.

Code	System	Display	Definition
SECINTOBS	http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode	security integrity observation	Type of security metadata observation made about the integrity of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which may be used to make access control decisions. Rationale: A security integrity observation supports the requirement to guard against improper information modification or destruction, and includes ensuring information non-repudiation and authenticity. (44 U.S.C., SEC. 3542) Examples: Types of security integrity metadata include: Integrity status, which indicates the completeness or workflow status of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) Integrity confidence, which indicates the reliability and trustworthiness of an IT resource Integrity control, which indicates pertinent handling caveats, obligations, refrain policies, and purpose of use for the resource Data integrity, which indicate the security mechanisms used to ensure that the accuracy and consistency are preserved regardless of changes made (ISO/IEC DIS 2382-8) Alteration integrity, which indicate the security mechanisms used for authorized transformations of the resource Integrity provenance, which indicates the entity responsible for a report or assertion relayed "second-hand" about an IT resource
SECALTINTOBS	http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode	security alteration integrity observation	Type of security metadata observation made about the alteration integrity of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which indicates the mechanism used for authorized transformations of the resource. Examples: Types of security alteration integrity observation metadata, which may value the observation with a code used to indicate the mechanism used for authorized transformation of an IT resource, including: translation syntactic transformation semantic mapping redaction masking pseudonymization anonymization
SECDATINTOBS	http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode	security data integrity observation	Type of security metadata observation made about the data integrity of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which indicates the security mechanism used to preserve resource accuracy and consistency. Data integrity is defined by ISO 22600-23.3.21 as: "The property that data has not been altered or destroyed in an unauthorized manner", and by ISO/IEC 2382-8: The property of data whose accuracy and consistency are preserved regardless of changes made." Examples: Types of security data integrity observation metadata, which may value the observation, include cryptographic hash function and digital signature.
SECINTCONOBS	http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode	security integrity confidence observation	Type of security metadata observation made about the integrity confidence of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which may be used to make access control decisions. Examples: Types of security integrity confidence observation metadata, which may value the observation, include highly reliable, uncertain reliability, and not reliable. Usage Note: A security integrity confidence observation on an Act may indicate that a valued Act.uncertaintycode attribute has been overridden by the entity responsible for ascribing the SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservationValue. This supports the business requirements for increasing or decreasing the assessment of the reliability or trustworthiness of an IT resource based on parameters beyond the original assignment of an Act statement level of uncertainty.
SECINTPRVABOBS	http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode	security integrity provenance asserted by observation	Type of security metadata observation made about the integrity provenance of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which indicates the entity that made assertions about the resource. The asserting entity may not be the original informant about the resource. Examples: Types of security integrity provenance asserted by observation metadata, which may value the observation, including: assertions about an IT resource by a patient assertions about an IT resource by a clinician assertions about an IT resource by a device
SECINTPRVRBOBS	http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode	security integrity provenance reported by observation	Type of security metadata observation made about the integrity provenance of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which indicates the entity that reported the existence of the resource. The reporting entity may not be the original author of the resource. Examples: Types of security integrity provenance reported by observation metadata, which may value the observation, include: reports about an IT resource by a patient reports about an IT resource by a clinician reports about an IT resource by a device
SECINTSTOBS	http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode	security integrity status observation	Type of security metadata observation made about the integrity status of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), which may be used to make access control decisions. Indicates the completeness of an IT resource in terms of workflow status, which may impact users that are authorized to access and use the resource. Examples: Types of security integrity status observation metadata, which may value the observation, include codes from the HL7 DocumentCompletion code system such as legally authenticated, in progress, and incomplete.

Source1

{
  "resourceType": "ValueSet",
  "id": "R5-v3-SecurityIntegrityObservationType-for-R4B",
  "text": {
    "status": "generated",
    "div": "<!-- snip (see above) -->"
  },
  "extension": [
    {
      "url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg",
      "valueCode": "fhir"
    },
    {
      "extension": [
        {
          "url": "packageId",
          "valueId": "hl7.fhir.uv.xver-r5.r4b"
        },
        {
          "url": "version",
          "valueString": "0.0.1-snapshot-2"
        }
      ],
      "url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/package-source"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-fmm",
      "valueInteger": 0,
      "_valueInteger": {
        "extension": [
          {
            "url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-conformance-derivedFrom",
            "valueCanonical": "http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/ImplementationGuide/hl7.fhir.uv.xver-r5.r4b"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-standards-status",
      "valueCode": "trial-use",
      "_valueCode": {
        "extension": [
          {
            "url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-conformance-derivedFrom",
            "valueCanonical": "http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/ImplementationGuide/hl7.fhir.uv.xver-r5.r4b"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  ],
  "url": "http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/ValueSet/R5-v3-SecurityIntegrityObservationType-for-R4B",
  "version": "0.0.1-snapshot-2",
  "name": "R5_v3_SecurityIntegrityObservationType_for_R4B",
  "title": "Cross-version VS for R5.SecurityIntegrityObservationType for use in FHIR R4B",
  "status": "active",
  "experimental": false,
  "date": "2025-09-01T22:37:05.396272+10:00",
  "publisher": "FHIR Infrastructure",
  "contact": [
    {
      "name": "FHIR Infrastructure",
      "telecom": [
        {
          "system": "url",
          "value": "http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/fiwg"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "description": "This cross-version ValueSet represents concepts from http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SecurityIntegrityObservationType|2.0.0 for use in FHIR R4B. Concepts not present here have direct `equivalent` mappings crossing all versions from R5 to R4B.",
  "jurisdiction": [
    {
      "coding": [
        {
          "system": "http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49.htm",
          "code": "001",
          "display": "World"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "compose": {
    "include": [
      {
        "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode",
        "version": "8.0.0",
        "concept": [
          {
            "code": "SECINTOBS",
            "display": "security integrity observation"
          },
          {
            "code": "SECALTINTOBS",
            "display": "security alteration integrity observation"
          },
          {
            "code": "SECDATINTOBS",
            "display": "security data integrity observation"
          },
          {
            "code": "SECINTCONOBS",
            "display": "security integrity confidence observation"
          },
          {
            "code": "SECINTPRVABOBS",
            "display": "security integrity provenance asserted by observation"
          },
          {
            "code": "SECINTPRVRBOBS",
            "display": "security integrity provenance reported by observation"
          },
          {
            "code": "SECINTSTOBS",
            "display": "security integrity status observation"
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "expansion": {
    "timestamp": "2025-09-01T22:37:05.396272+10:00",
    "contains": [
      {
        "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode",
        "version": "8.0.0",
        "code": "SECINTOBS",
        "display": "security integrity observation"
      },
      {
        "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode",
        "version": "8.0.0",
        "code": "SECALTINTOBS",
        "display": "security alteration integrity observation"
      },
      {
        "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode",
        "version": "8.0.0",
        "code": "SECDATINTOBS",
        "display": "security data integrity observation"
      },
      {
        "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode",
        "version": "8.0.0",
        "code": "SECINTCONOBS",
        "display": "security integrity confidence observation"
      },
      {
        "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode",
        "version": "8.0.0",
        "code": "SECINTPRVABOBS",
        "display": "security integrity provenance asserted by observation"
      },
      {
        "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode",
        "version": "8.0.0",
        "code": "SECINTPRVRBOBS",
        "display": "security integrity provenance reported by observation"
      },
      {
        "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode",
        "version": "8.0.0",
        "code": "SECINTSTOBS",
        "display": "security integrity status observation"
      }
    ]
  }
}